The Bloodline of Tyranny can be traced back in thiscountry to a mentality that formed within the circles of power that began toconsolidate during the Constitutional Convention. Within those debates thedesire for a federal oligarchy was planted, pruned back, yet the roots of thatdesire remained, living deep within the soil, ready to sprout and spread itsvile contempt for the Liberty of the People. This seed of Tyrannical Oligarchycan be easily traced through various political policies and actions from thebeginning until this present time.

There were several distinctions between the twogroups, the two mind-sets; it is no different today as this struggle continuesfor our Liberty. The mind-set of oligarchy has not changed, nor have those whosupport such mentalities, nor has the battle that began during those formativeyears of our Republic.

It became evident that there were two very differentrationales at work; one quickly became represented by the Federalist Party onone side, the other by the Republican-Democratic Party. While it is not myintent to delve into a detailed history of the beginning of this struggle, itwill provide profiles of the men and the reasons behind the formation of thosetwo very different camps of political thought and how we are still effectedtoday as the same struggle continues.

While it became apparent during the ConstitutionalConvention that there were those who saw the opportunity to establish ImperialGovernment, the forces against them, thankfully, were substantial. Eventuallyhowever, the great American Monarchists represented by the Federalist Partygained power and the great struggle for the future of our Republic began inearnest in 1796 with the election of John Adams. The Federalist Party’splatform favored a highly centralized government and extremely strong Executivewithout the checks and balances to hinder or limit its power or scope. It was,in a very real sense, a Party of Monarchy whereas the Republican-DemocraticParty was totally opposite, seeking a very decentralized government with checksand balances to limit the reach of government into the lives of the People.

As the critical formation of the Republic began,Hamilton laid eleven proposals at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 inwhich he sought to base the government of the Republic on, these propositionswere so Monarchists in tone and substance that they received little supportexcept from those of the New England States and were rejected. Governor Morris,a friend of Hamilton stated: “ Hamilton hated Republican Government, and neverfailed on every occasion to advocate the excellence of and avow his attachmentto a Monarchic form of Government.”

From the very beginning of this country, theFederalist, particularly in New England, nurtured and maintained a pure hatredand fear of the ideals the Republic. While at one time Hamilton was a championof those ideals, he soon became the leader of this group that espoused aMonarchist Oligarchy. In his opposition to Jefferson, he railed out “The People!Gentlemen, I tell you the people are a great beast!”

The hatred was so intense that during the 1796elections, Governor Walcott of Connecticut stated: “I sincerely declare that Iwish the Northern States would separate from the Southern the moment that event[the election of Jefferson] shall take place.”

The Federalist Party desired to either completelyseparate from the Southern States or form their own Confederacy of NorthernStates, or to completely destroy any and all power within the South and alongwith it all traces of Jeffersonian principles from the government. This desirenever, ever changed through the history or the transformation of the FederalistParty, as it became the Whig Party and then the Republican Party.

As the Federalists began to wield their powers underthe Administration of John Adams, the first tinge of evidence to the desire andpurpose of the Oligarchist was the Aliens and Seditions Act of 1798, whichprovided a singular reservoir of power in the hands of the President and allowhim to expel foreign citizens suspected of treason. Additionally, it made itillegal to oppose any measure of the government and any false or perceivedhostile words against the government or its policies.

Thankfully, there was waiting in the defense of ourRepublic two men and two States that stood in the gap to defy these Monarchistwho craved an American Oligarchy with an unquenchable lust that has continuedthroughout the history of our fair Land. Those men, of course, were ThomasJefferson and James Madison and those courageous State Republics were Virginiaand Kentucky.

After the death of Jefferson, theRepublican-Democratic Party dropped Republican from the name and the DemocraticParty was born and remained the Party of Jefferson and Madison until it wascompletely destroyed by the Reconstruction Act. The Federalist Party foughtfrom 1796 until it’s apparent demise at the end of the War of 1812, but theCentralist Ideals found their way back into the political arena with theformation of the Whig Party, which once again sought to transform this Republicinto a Centralized Oligarchy. The old Federalists and Whigs ideologiesbasically united and organized, taking on a name that when used would bedeceptively favorable to the public. The heart of the Party still contained allof its progenitors’ creeds, doctrines, hatred and purpose. It had and continuesto have a passionate desire for power and will use any necessary means toacquire its end.

As we know, the Republican Party effectively consumedthat Party, but as it was transformed its platform was increasingly radicalizedduring the late 1850’s and during the 1860’s. Nevertheless, the RepublicanParty, the GOP is the inheritor of all the Centralist Ideals, the MonarchistPrinciples of the Federalist Party and the Whig Party before it. The Bloodlineof Tyranny had been effectively passed from one generation to the next and itwas this fateful generation of Centralists that saw the beginning of thefulfillment of all the desires of its progenitor Monarchists in our country’sbirth.

Make no mistake about it, the Republican Party todayis the Party of Lincoln, but the Democratic Party today is definitely not theParty of Jefferson.

Now, if you trace the line of this heinous ideology,you will find a direct linage down to the Republican Party. The hatred of theSouth and the Democratic Party of Jefferson continued, it never waned nor didits primary purpose in total control over government weaken through the decadesfrom 1796 to the fall of the Confederacy and beyond.

In fact, if you read the works of Wendell Phillips, aNew England Republican Firebrand, you will quickly learn the agenda of theRepublican Party of Lincoln from the very beginning, it was keeping the flameof Oligarchy alive and would stop at nothing until it accomplished its vilegoals of domination. Wendell Phillips stated: “The Republican Party is in nosense a national party. It is a party of the North, organized against theSouth.” Why? The South, particularly the Old South that was recognizedprimarily as Virginia, Kentucky, the Carolinas and Georgia, were allstrongholds of the Jeffersonian Ideal for a Republic of, by and for the People.The reality is that the war on the South didn’t begin in the 1860s, but back in1796 with the Federalist Party, it was the offspring of that Party, theRepublican Party of Lincoln that finally accomplished the goals of the oldFederalist Party.

To get a very detailed expose on the agenda of thisgroup and their long-term goals you need not look any further than the OliveBranch published in 1814. In those papers you will find the following: “ ANorthern Confederacy has been the objective for a number of years. They [thepoliticians of New England] have repeatedly advocated in public print,separation of the States. The project of separation was formed shortly afterthe adoption of the federal Constitution. The promulgation of the project firstappeared in the year 1796 in the Pelham Papers. At that time there was none ofthat catalogue of grievances, which since that period, have been fabricated tojustify the recent attempt to dissolve the Union. At that time there was no“Virginia Dynasty” [the description of Jefferson, Washington and Madison], no“Democratic Madness, no “war with Great Britain.” The affairs of the countryseemed to be precisely according to New England’s fondest wishes. Yet, at thatfavorable time (1796) New England was dissatisfied with the Union and begun toplot to get out of it. The common people however, were not ready to break up theUnion. The common people at that time had no dislike of the Southern States.”

It goes on to say: “For eighteen years the mostunceasing endeavors have been used to poison the minds of the people of theEastern States toward, and to alienate them from, their fellow citizens of theSouthern States. The people of the South have been portrayed as “demonsincarnate”, as destitute of all the “good qualities which dignify and adornhuman nature”. Nothing can exceed the virulence of the pictures drawn of the South’speople, their descriptions of whom would have more suited the ferociousinhabitants of New Zealand than a polished, civilized people.”

As always, the political agenda of tyranny will alwaysdemonize what they perceive as their opponents to complete autocratic control.So, the doctrine of hatred, always used to affect the most politicallyexpedient results, continued from 1796 until the goal was reached. In theHartford Courant of 1796, in Extract No. 1, the clarity of this goal of tyrannywas explained with little reservation: “The question must soon be decidedwhether we shall continue as one Nation. Many advantages were supposed to besecured and many evils avoided by a Union of States, but at that time thoseadvantages and evils were magnified to far greater size than either would be ifthe question at this moment were to be settled. The Northern States can subsistas a Nation, a Republic, without any connection with the Southern. If theSouthern people were possessed with the same political ideas, our Union wouldbe more close than in separation.”

Such were the kinder and more civilized words thatcame from the mind of the Federalists in their concerted effort to drive acomplete and absolute wedge into the heart and soul of the American ConstitutionalRepublic. They even went as far as publishing maps for the school children ofNew England, with the study of the old Morris geography, these children readilyaccepted the slander as portrayed in the maps. The South was in black torepresent the barbarous infidels, the North in white to represent theenlightenment of New England. It was, like all indoctrination, extremelyeffective.

In Carpenter’s Logic of History in 1864 you find thefollowing:
 “The Northeastern States early sought to create prejudice anddisunion sentiment, not on account of existing fact, but to array sectionagainst section, to stimulate hate and discord for the purpose of acceleratingtheir darling object, the dissolution of the Union and the formation of aNortheastern Confederacy. Press, politicians and preachers were continuallyharping on causes, which made disunion desirable. The motives which actuatedNew England disunionists was the desire to have what Hamilton called a stronggovernment, understood to mean an Autocracy similar to that of England, a largestanding army, a heavy public debt, owned by the favored few, to whom thecommon masses should pay tribute, under the guise of interest. The main publicoffices were to be held by the rich and noble for long periods, or for life. Itwas argued that a national debt would be a national blessing, and prohibitivetariff, under the guise of protection, be a blessing. These were the motiveswhich led the early Federalist to want disunion.”

As we can see, all of the desires of this Bloodline ofTyranny have been fulfilled in this country through a long line of subversionsand intrigues. This vile gospel of hatred was directed toward the South for noother reason except the Ideals of the Constitutional Republic were extremelystrong in the South; it had retained the purity of the Jeffersonian Ideal. Allmanner of vile prejudices were used to incite the people of the North to growin their hatred against the South.

These same voices continued with their onslaughtagainst Jeffersonian ideals and the promise of a Free Republic. The principlesupon which this Republic was created was not the goal of the RadicalRepublicans of the mid-1800s anymore than it was of the Whig Party or theprogenitor Federalist Party. Though the Party name changed, the basicprinciples remained intact, the goal of an all powerful, centralized governmentimbued with the ability to do as it pleased, when it pleased never faded.

If you read the commentary of the day, if you readeven the sermons from the New England pulpits, you will see a very concertedeffort to spread discord, hate and envy toward the Jeffersonian South. If itwere not for such tactics, the unholy work of Federalist Tyranny would havenever taken root nor would the War of the 1860s taken place.

As time progressed, tactics continued to be employedto exact a progressive measure of success toward the goal of centralization. Acorrupt system of favors, select appointments, bribes and government corporateblessings allowed for the taint of tyranny to reach even deeper into the heartof the halls of power. As with the desire for a highly centralized governmentwas being realized, so too was the necessity for a centralized banking system,intent on completely the goal of peonage from the mass of general population.

For over fifty years, the Northern New England Stateswere the seat of power and influence; they peddled their wears adeptly. Duringthose years the disunionists cried for separation, it was a universal rightacknowledged by all the States from the time of the Ratification of theConstitution. The doctrine of Secession was never questioned, never doubteduntil it became an issue that would directly affect the wealth of the federalgovernment and those who held economic sway of the halls of power.

There was, from the time of prior to the Constitutionuntil the months preceding the War on the South, no group or political partywithin this country called, at any time, for loyalty toward a national,centralized government over the State governments. The allegiance was to theStates; never to the federal government because it was only a reflection of theState Republics therefore, the doctrine of Secession as a Right was neverquestioned. In fact, until the moment Lincoln pressed War on the South therewas never any question, even in Lincoln’s mind judging from his speeches, thatany State and their Citizens had the absolute Right of Secession.

The historical record of the New England States isripe, not only with the desire for disunion, but it upheld the Right ofSecession as a given until it appears that the costs of such disunion on thepart of the South would prove far to expensive to the North. It is amazing thatup until the beginning of the War on the South, the Republican Party advocatedthe principle of State Sovereignty and the Right of Secession that quicklychanged as they realized that without the treasure trove of the South that theNorth would be bankrupted.

With victory over the South, the Northern RadicalRepublican Party had almost realized their long dream; the struggle to fulfillthat dream continued throughout the period of Reconstruction. In a very realsense, The Reconstruction should be called the Restructuring, for its goal wasto destroy the effectiveness and power of the Democratic Party throughout theSouth, isolate the remnant of that Party in the North and to absorb that Partyinto a partnership while maintaining the guise of Party differences. To thisday, there are differences, but not of any real substance, both Parties havethe same agenda: Oligarchy.

By the later part of the 1800s it was clear that theremnants of State Sovereignty had been wiped away, along with the checks andbalances associated with such Sovereignty. During McKinley’s last campaign,Jefferson was derided as a vile visionary, damned as a French anarchist whileHamilton was lauded as a National hero. By 1881 and the election of Garfield,the Hamiltonians had finally won the prize of Nationalistic Monarchy. TheSentinel said it best: “Garfield’s rule will be the transitory period betweenState Sovereignty and National Sovereignty. The United States Senate will giveway to a National Senate. State Constitutions and the United States Senate arerelics of State Sovereignty and implements of treason. Garfield’s Presidencywill be the Regency of Stalwartism; after that-REX.”

On July 3, 1881 James Garfield said: “The influence ofJefferson’s Democratic principles is rapidly waning, while the principles ofHamilton are rapidly increasing. Power has been gravitating toward the CentralGovernment.”

Indeed, that power did not gravitate, but it wasforcefully wrenched with one strong yank to the Central Government at the handsof that Hamiltonian Monarchist Mr. Lincoln.

The era of Radical Republican Nationalists effectivelydominated the country from 1860 to 1912 with the one exception, the one ray oflight when the Bourbon Democrat Stephen Grover Cleveland entered office from1885 to 1897. After years of corruption, political favoritism and patronage,political bossism, Imperialism, subsidies and inflationary excesses, Mr.Cleveland ushered in a period of honesty, political integrity and sense ofindependence from centralized authoritarianism, indeed he ushered in a periodthat is as close to Jeffersonian Liberalism as had been seen in almost acentury previous and none since.

The Honorable Mr. Cleveland said: "The lessons ofpaternalism ought to be unlearned and the better lesson taught that while thepeople should patriotically and cheerfully support their Government itsfunctions do not include the support of the people.”

"This vigilance on the part of the citizen, andan active interest and participation in political concerns, are the safeguardsof his rights; but sluggish indifference to political privileges invites themachinations of those who wait to betray the people's trust."

"Parties may be so long in power, and may becomeso arrogant and careless of the interests of the people, as to grow heedless oftheir responsibility to their masters. But the time comes, as certainly asdeath, when the people weigh them in the balance."

The promise of a resurgence of the Jeffersonian idealssoon faded with the election of McKinley.

During McKinley’s last campaign, Jefferson was deridedas a vile visionary, damned as a French anarchist while Hamilton was lauded asa National hero. McKinley then effectively turned the Radical RepublicanNationalism into a force that called for Radical Interventionism andImperialism.

With the election of Wilson, the transformation of theDemocratic Party was complete. Wilson instituted policies that would be asclose to Hamiltonian Nationalism as could be, on all fronts Nationalism,Centralization of both government and finance was achieved under Wilson. Whilethe passage of the Federal Reserve Act and the 16th Amendment are oftenconsidered be the most devastating elements implemented by the WilsonAdministration; in fact the most devastating element was the 17th Amendment,which effectively completed the Nationalization of the Senate. This completedthe extermination of State Sovereignty and put the Senate on the open market ofpolitical corruption. The Wilsonian Democrats might as well have beenLincolnite Republicans.

With the election of FDR, the Nationalists came intotheir own, with a reach and scope of powers that Mr. Lincoln could have onlydreamed about. The policies of FDR consolidated all government into the handsof the few, into the Political Nobility where the people’s dependence upongovernment was made possible and complete.

We now live in a de facto Socialist regime, one thathas been systematically orchestrated through the years, not overtly, butthrough subterfuge, through incremental legislation and the transformation oftraditional political ideologies into a Centralized National Government.

Upon the Nationalist Foundation the two parties nowrest. There truly is not a nickel’s worth of difference between the two. EachParty has, in effect, become a hybrid of the other, in form and essence theirpolitics only pretend to contradict each other on the shallowest levels. Theyuse emotional issues to tug upon the electorate during the elections, but thefundamental foundation of each Party is now the same.

Both modern Parties have effectively divided Americainto two very distinct classes; one are the office-holders, the power-brokers,the corporatists who are little more than the new nobility and then there arethe peons, which support the seats of power on which our rulers, our lords nowsit and rule. The laboring peonage, who toil and labor to create the wealththat our rulers and their patrons revel in just as any nobility of old. Notonly has the Republican Party, and now thanks to the Reconstruction, theDemocratic Party as well, been that of high taxation both hidden and overt, buthigh benefits for its upper membership, despotic legislations, usurpation ofpowers, but as we have seen the last century and a half have seen morebloodshed and more misery around the world and here at home then should haveever been tolerated by any civilized people who value Liberty.

The Roots of Tyranny are deep and wide spread, we mustnever make the mistake of thinking that we can graft a branch of liberty ontothe rootstock of Tyranny for all we will get is a tasteless fruit that cannever nurture Freedom and can never reproduce itself. The Roots of Tyranny mustbe completely dug out of the fertile ground of our country, every leader rootdestroyed otherwise it will simply take root again and spread its vileinfluences over good government and the lives of our People.

"Sovereignty is the highest degree of politicalpower, and the establishment of a form of government, the highest proof whichcan be given of its existence. The states could have not reserved any rights byarticles of their union, if they had not been sovereign, because they couldhave no rights, unless they flowed from that source. In the creation of thefederal government, the states exercised the highest act of sovereignty, andthey may, if they please, repeat the proof of their sovereignty, by itsannihilation. But the union possesses no innate sovereignty, like the states;it was not self-constituted; it is conventional, and of course subordinate tothe sovereignties by which it was formed." -John Taylor of Caroline.

~The attempt to unify the Executive and Judicialpowers by this Administration as others also have in the past, and to basicallynullify the powers of Congress, will ultimately subject the People to nopermanent security in their Rights, their Liberty, or their Freedom. Once theExecutive assumes the power to interpret the law, or circumvent the law to bendit to his will and intent, the Executive can, with impunity, gratify any designor rapacious desire upon the Nation and the People.

When Executive/Judicial unity evolves, government hasthe tendency to become absolute in its authority and thus, it extends suchauthoritarian rule to every aspect of the People’s lives, regulating theirLiberty as though it were a commodity granted by the government itself. It isonly when the government is restricted and limited that it cannot control theunalienable Rights of Man, once such limitations and restrictions areside-stepped or lifted, government begins to engineer society to its own endsinstead of toward the goals of Individual Liberty.

In the Founding of Our Republic, the Framers allowedfor the maximum amount of delegated power to be distributed between the threebranches of government to allow for the greatest balance in discernment andwisdom to actual govern justly. It also balanced the power of the federalgovernment with the more diverse powers of the State Republics. As we all know,when that balance is manipulated, the government tends to gravitate toward theability to exert its power in a manner which is contrary to ConstitutionalOrder which naturally lifts the limitations of government and imposeslimitations upon the People instead.

When a government is constituted by such imbalancewithin its branches, it no longer affords the People their Liberty based uponequality, but begins to control the People based upon laws to which they havenever given their consent. Government, within its ability and desire tolegislate, begins to increasingly ignore the voice of the People. Such agovernment, as with respect to the Individual, becomes nothing more than atyrannical state of codes, regulations, laws, acts, executive orders, andsigning statements.

The People have become nothing more than objects ofthe government’s legislation, without proper representation, we serve at themercy of the government’s will through their power to legislate, more and more,over the lives of the Individual.

The government, and it’s ever-invading legislation,can no longer trust the Individual with his own life, his property, his abilityto care for his children, or to make decisions or contracts. The government andits desire to place some type of control over the Individual touch every aspectof the Individual’s life, in one way or another. This cannot continue, norshould we allow such a government to feel as though it is free to decide whatis best for the lives of the People, for the People’s business is the government,but the government’s business is not the People.

Until the Spirit of Liberty once again takes root inthe hearts and minds of the People, the ability of the government to assumetyrannical authority over the People will be certain. We, as a Nation, havebecome prey to those who are, by nature, usurpers and tyrants because we havemisplaced our sense of Liberty and what it means to be Free. Government,without the voice of the People and the Spirit of Liberty, will always besubject to those baneful effects brought on by incredible wealth and the lustfor unrestricted power. Such a government becomes diseased, cankered, andsuffers from internal decay and spoil.

It is evident that the slavery of a People is alwaysfound within the ignorance of their Right to Liberty. Without the prevailingSpirit of Liberty, the People become manipulated, subjecting themselves toevery form of submission, even to the point that they may come to adore orworship their slave-master as a supreme leader over their lives, theirproperty, and their futures. It has never been an uncommon thing for the Peopleto lose sight of their Liberty while they are eager to pursue wealth,government will normally assist in such pursuits until it gains more controlover the People, then it becomes easy to rob them of their Liberty, and ignoretheir call for Justice.

Tyranny, Totalitarianism,Authoritarianism, and Despotism crave nothing more than the wealth of thePeople and the ability to enforce its will upon the People; whether that forceis touted as security measures or emergency measures, the results are the same.We may have lost the helm of government to those who lack wisdom, but as theirweakness begin to manifest itself to the People, and as their law becomes amuch heavier yoke upon the necks of the People, the People will once again gainthe Spirit of Liberty, which always cries for Freedom.

Before Abraham Lincoln was bought and paid for by theMercantilists of his day he stated: "This country, with its institutions,belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of theexisting Government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amendingit or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it."

Truly amazing words from a man who would later proveto be one of the more destructive forces of Constitutionalism in this country’shistory, whether intentional or not, until the advent of Wilson, FDR and then,of course, the Bush Administration.

The question is do We, the People, have therevolutionary Right to case off the bonds of a government that no longergoverns according to the express will or consent the governed?

As this government increases its reach, beyond theimplied and restricted duties of the Constitution, it uses the law to enclose,restrict and therefore, rule the People, not on the basis of consent butthrough coercion. There comes a time when a government, such as ours, pushesthe limits of its power and authority to the point that it not only infringesupon the Rights of the People, but it also prepares to defend itself againstthe possibility of the People rising in defense of those Rights.

When our government prepares to screen and documentthe population with a systematic registration and identification system;placing very definite restrictions upon the ability to move between State toState and potentially to the ability to work without such documentation, thenit is time to take notice, pay close attention and prepare. When our governmentintends to utilize group census data that connects you and all your relativeswithin a database, it is time to take note, pay close attention and prepare.These are not merely measures that ensure against possible threats from“terrorists”; they can and will be readily used to covertly collectsurveillance on the American Citizens. Such preparations, sold to the AmericanPublic under the guise of defense against external threats, are little morethan preparation for authoritarian rule.

The current political ideology that permeates thiscountry through the joint efforts of both political parties has taken over ahundred years to come to fruition, unfortunately we don’t have that long toreverse the process.

I would, of course, rather see a relative peacefultransitional reform of this government however, I am also extremely realisticthat prying the reigns of power away from those who now jealously guard theirideological and monetary priorities will be not be easy to accomplish, suchtasks never are easy.

It will be necessary to field politicians within bothparties, candidates who are dedicated to the cause of the Republic. Thestarting place will be the States, for although it is an uphill battle; thathill is not nearly as difficult as it would be on the national political arena.The elections of the State legislatures are rarely newsmakers and theinfiltration of such legislative bodies will be far easier and less noticedthen that of Congress. While we should never ignore Congress, I believe it willnot only be more effective to strategically place our Constitutional candidateswithin the states at this time, but it will eventually become a very importantdisplay of the Peoples will. The reason we must regain the States first toeffect the direction of the federal government through numbers. Once the Statesare, more or less, under our control we can place pressure upon the federalgovernment by denying it the ability usurp the authority of the States.Road-blocks from the States will effectively stifle the federal governmentsability to encroach upon the individual States ability to govern until themajority of State governments have effectively been subdued under our control.

The message is as powerful today as it was in 1776,powerful enough to move a nation to defend themselves against all enemies,including those within their own government. Today, we are witness to a growingdistaste for those who hold office in this country. The perception that ourleaders have betrayed their oath of office to uphold and defend theConstitution, that they have betrayed the function of good government, and thatthey have betrayed the Citizens is rapidly growing. There will come a time, notin the distant future, when that distaste will reach a boiling point; this factis readily known by this current government and in response it is hastilymaking preparations for that eventuality.

Increasingly, we will see the rise of extraordinarymen and women, from all walks of life, who will take the stand that thiscountry, the Liberty and Freedom upon which it was erected is more importantthen party affiliation, more important then the possibility of material gainand more important then their own lives.

Every revolution basically begins with a few dedicatedpeople, the message eventually spreads through small, insignificant groups atfirst, but soon the message becomes a part of the society as a whole, as moreand more questions arise about the current system and how it functions. Aspeople are informed to ask the right questions they will eventually demandanswers that don’t just seek to ply them with platitudes and politicalpromises.

People are not naturally inclined toward revolution,but as the level of stress and daily misery increases due to the Mercantilistpolicies of this government, whether under Republican or Democratic control,they will inch out of the mire of the status quo and once again place demandsupon this government that is suppose to Serve the People.

I place no trust in either political party machine andless in the government they infect. If we are to cast off this idiocy thatpasses as government, then we must use both parties to our, the People’sadvantage and fully take them over. Each of us must be willing to run forpublic office or at least support those who support Constitutional Order. TheSeeds of Revolution were planted long ago and we are seeing the right elementsto make them grow and spread.

It is time for a REVOLUTION, onethat will completely destroy the power of the elite to control the People, tomanage their Liberty based upon their contingent compliance and subject them toa life of peonage through a fiat system that primarily rewards political andcorporate power instead of the honest labor of the People.

Thomas Jefferson placed Liberty within the framework,not of the law, but of the will of the People and the respect of other’s Rightsbased upon equality: "Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according toour will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do notadd 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will,and always so when it violates the rights of the individual."

In Liberty,
Republicae-Seditionist

---